The following kinetic parameters were found on day 7 and in month 3 respectively after administration of 0.8 mg/m² everolimus twice daily: Cmax: 13.5 ng/ml and 10.1 ng/ml respectively Cl/F: 10.2 l/hour/m² and 12.3 l/hour/m² respectively tmax: 1 hour and 1 hour respectively The following half-lives were found after administration of 2.1, 3, 5 and 6.5 mg/m² respectively: t½: 18, 15.9, 17.7, 15.2 hours respectively.
Limited data in patients aged < 3 years (n=13) indicates that the BSA-normalized clearance is approximately twice as high in patients with a small body size (BSA 0.556 m²) as in adults.
dose recommendation of formulary compared to licensed use (on-label versus off-label)
No information is present at this moment.
Available formulations
No information is present at this moment.
Dosages
Go to:
Prophylaxis for rejection of a transplanted kidney
The dose must be titrated to achieve trough concentrations of 5–15 ng/ml. The dose may be increased in order to obtain a greater trough concentration in the whole blood that is then within the target range for obtaining the optimum efficacy, taking account of the tolerability.
The dose must be titrated to achieve trough concentrations of 5–15 ng/ml. The dose may be increased in order to obtain a greater trough concentration in the whole blood that is then within the target range for obtaining the optimum efficacy, taking account of the tolerability.
Refractory epileptic seizures associated with TSC WITHOUT CYP3A4/PgP inducer
Initially:
6
mg/m²/day
in 1
dose Increase the starting dose in steps of 1-4 mg, depending on the concentrations..
The dose must be titrated to achieve trough concentrations of 5–15 ng/ml. The dose may be increased in order to obtain a greater trough concentration in the whole blood that is then within the target range for obtaining the optimum efficacy, taking account of the tolerability.
Initially:
5
mg/m²/day
in 1
dose Increase the starting dose in steps of 1-4 mg, depending on the concentrations..
The dose must be titrated to achieve trough concentrations of 5–15 ng/ml. The dose may be increased in order to obtain a greater trough concentration in the whole blood that is then within the target range for obtaining the optimum efficacy, taking account of the tolerability.
Refractory epileptic seizures associated with TSC combined with CYP3A4/PgP inducer
Initially:
9
mg/m²/day
in 1
dose Increase the starting dose in steps of 1-4 mg, depending on the concentrations..
The dose must be titrated to achieve trough concentrations of 5–15 ng/ml. The dose may be increased in order to obtain a greater trough concentration in the whole blood that is then within the target range for obtaining the optimum efficacy, taking account of the tolerability.
Initially:
8
mg/m²/day
in 1
dose Increase the starting dose in steps of 1-4 mg, depending on the concentrations..
The dose must be titrated to achieve trough concentrations of 5–15 ng/ml. The dose may be increased in order to obtain a greater trough concentration in the whole blood that is then within the target range for obtaining the optimum efficacy, taking account of the tolerability.
Renal impaiment in children > 3 months
No information available on dose adjustment in renal impairment.
The complete list of all undesirable drug reactions can be found in the national Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) – click here
Side effects in children
Mouth ulcers [Franz 2016]. Cases of exacerbation (Wiemer-Kruel and Krueger) and even initiation (Krueger) of epileptic seizures when everolimus is used have been described. Infections are more common in children and more serious.
The complete list of all contra-indications can be found in the national Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) – click here
Contra-indications in children
Impaired liver function.
The complete list of all warnings and precautions can be found in the national Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) – click here
Warnings & precautions in children
If the patient has not yet completed the National Vaccination Programme, it is preferable to complete it first, if possible and accelerated if necessary.
Interactions
The complete list of all interactions can be found in the national Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) – click here
Ettenger R et al, Multicenter trial of everolimus in pediatric renal transplant recipients: results at three year, Pediatr Transplant, 2008 , Jun;12(4), 456-63
Fouladi M et al, Phase I study of everolimus in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors, J Clin Oncol, 2007 , Oct 20;25(30), 4806-12
Franz DN et al, Efficacy and safety of everolimus for subependymal giant cell astrocytomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (EXIST-1): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, Lancet, 2013, Jan 12;381(9861), 125-32
Hoyer PF et al, Everolimus in pediatric de nova renal transplant patients, Transplantation, 2003, Jun 27;75(12), 2082-5
Pape L et al, Pediatric kidney transplantation followed by de novo therapy with everolimus, low-dose cyclosporine A, and steroid elimination: 3-year data, Transplantation, 2011, Sep 27;92(6), 658-62
Grushkin C et al., De novo therapy with everolimus and reduced-exposure cyclosporine following pediatric kidney transplantation: a prospective, multicenter, 12-month study, Pediatr Transplant, 2013, May;17(3), 237-43
Wiemer-Kruel A et al, Everolimus for the treatment of subependymal giant cell astrocytoma probably causing seizure aggravation in a child with tuberous sclerosis complex: a case report. , Neuropediatrics. , 2014, Apr;45(2), 129-31
Krueger DA et al, Everolimus for subependymal giant-cell astrocytomas in tuberous sclerosis, N Engl J Med, 2010, 4;363(19), 1801-11
Franz DN et al., Long-Term Use of Everolimus in Patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Final Results from the EXIST-1 Study, PLoS One., 2016, Jun 28;11(6), e0158476
French JA et al, Adjunctive everolimus therapy for treatment-resistant focal-onset seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis (EXIST-3): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study., Lancet, 2016, Oct 29;388(10056), 2153-2163
Billing H et al., Longitudinal growth on an everolimus- versus an MMF-based steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen in paediatric renal transplant recipients, Transpl Int. , 2013 , Sep;26(9), 903-9