T½ = 15-20 hours in children (> 3 months) and the VP is on average 0.95 l/kg (3 months to 12 years) and 0.70 l/kg (12 to 16 years) [Brammer 1994, Saxén 1993]. Children on ECMO: Vd = 1.5 l/kg, Cl = 0.28 ml/min/kg, t½ = 60 hours [Watt 2012]
dose recommendation of formulary compared to licensed use (on-label versus off-label)
No information is present at this moment.
Available formulations
No information is present at this moment.
Dosages
Go to:
Mucosal candidiasis
Oral
Neonaten
0 days
up to
14 days
Initial dose:
Once on day 1
6
- 12
mg/kg/day
in 1
dose
Maintenance dose:
(=half of the starting dose)
3
- 6
mg/kg per 72 hours
in 1
dose
Duration of treatment:
The duration of treatment is based on the clinical and mycological response.
Neonates
14 days
up to
28 days
Initial dose:
Once only on Day 1:
6
- 12
mg/kg/day
in 1
dose
.
Maintenance dose:
(= half the initial dose)
3
- 6
mg/kg per 48 hours
in 1
dose
Duration of treatment:
The duration of treatment is based on the clinical and mycological response.
1 month
up to
12 years
Initial dose:
Once only on Day 1:
6
- 12
mg/kg/day
in 1
dose. Max: 800 mg/day.
Maintenance dose:
(= half the initial dose)
3
- 6
mg/kg/day
in 1
dose. Max: 400 mg/day.
Duration of treatment:
The duration of treatment is based on the clinical and mycological response.
12 years
up to
18 years
Initial dose:
400
mg/day
in 1
dose
Maintenance dose:
200
- 400
mg/day
in 1
dose Raise the maintenance dose to 400 mg/day, depending on the clinical response.
.
Duration of treatment:
The duration of treatment is based on the clinical and mycological response.
Only in exceptional and very severe infections: up to 20 mg/kg/day in a single dose, maximum 1600 mg/day.
Intravenous
Neonates
0 days
up to
14 days
Initial dose:
Once only on Day 1:
6
- 12
mg/kg/day
in 1
dose
Maintenance dose:
(= half the initial dose)
3
- 6
mg/kg per 72 hours
in 1
dose
Duration of treatment:
The duration of treatment is based on the clinical and mycological response.
Neonates
14 days
up to
28 days
Initial dose:
Once only on Day 1:
6
- 12
mg/kg/day
in 1
dose
Maintenance dose:
(= half the initial dose)
3
- 6
mg/kg per 48 hours
in 1
dose
Duration of treatment:
The duration of treatment is based on the clinical and mycological response.
1 month
up to
12 years
Initial dose:
Once only on Day 1:
6
- 12
mg/kg/day
in 1
dose. Max: 800 mg/day.
Maintenance dose:
(= half the initial dose)
3
- 6
mg/kg/day
in 1
dose. Max: 400 mg/day.
Duration of treatment:
The duration of treatment is based on the clinical and mycological response.
12 years
up to
18 years
Initial dose:
400
mg/day
in 1
dose
Maintenance dose:
200
- 400
mg/day
in 1
dose Raise the maintenance dose to 400 mg/day, depending on the clinical response..
Duration of treatment:
The duration of treatment is based on the clinical and mycological response.
Only in exceptional and very severe infections: up to 20 mg/kg/day in a single dose, maximum 1600 mg/day.
Systemic deep candidiasis, cryptococcal infections
Day 1: 100% of regular dose. Day 2 and further: 50 % of regular dose. Interval between two doses does not require adjustment
Dosage adjustment is not necessary in case of vaginal candidiasis (single administration or administration of 150 mg once a week).
GFR 10-30 ml/min/1.73 m2
5 percentage of single dose and dosing interval : uur
Day 1: 100% of regular dose. Day 2 and further: 50 % of regular dose. Interval between two doses does not require adjustment
Dosage adjustment is not necessary in case of vaginal candidiasis (single administration or administration of 150 mg once a week).
GFR < 10 ml/min/1.73 m2
Day 1: 100% of regular dose. Day 2 and further: 50 % of regular dose. Interval between two doses does not require adjustment.
Dosage adjustment is not necessary in case of vaginal candidiasis (single administration or administration of 150 mg once a week).
Patients on dialysis
Give 100% of the recommended dose after every haemodialysis. On days that dialysis is not being done, a lower dose should be given based on the GFR (see above).
The complete list of all undesirable drug reactions can be found in the national Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) – click here
Side effects in children
Impaired hepatic function occurs more frequently in children. Hypersensitivity and anaemia are specific side effects that occur in children.
The complete list of all contra-indications can be found in the national Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) – click here
Contra-indications
No information available on specific contra indications in children.
The complete list of all warnings and precautions can be found in the national Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) – click here
Warnings & precautions
No information available on specific warnings and precautions in children.
Interactions
The complete list of all interactions can be found in the national Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) – click here
Long SS, et al, Reducing Candida infections during neonatal intensive care: management choices, infection control, and fluconazole prophylaxis, J Pediatr, 2005, 147, 135-41
Clerihew L, et al, Systemic antifungal drugs for invasive fungal infection in preterm infants., Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 2004;, CD003953.
Kaufman D., Strategies for prevention of neonatal invasive candidiasis, Semin Perinatol, 2003, 27, 414-24
Martínez Sesmero JM, et al, Fungal chemoprophylaxis with fluconazole in preterm infants, Pharm World Sci, 2005, 27, 475-7
Manzoni P, et al, A multicenter, randomized trial of prophylactic fluconazole in preterm neonates, N Engl J Med, 2007, 14, 2483-95
Novelli V, et al, Safety and tolerability of fluconazole in children, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1999, 43, 1955 1960
Schwarze R, et al, Administration of fluconazole in children below 1 year of age, Mycoses, 1999, 42, 3-16
Aziz M et al, Efficacy of fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of invasive fungal infection in extremely low birth weight infants., Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2010, 29, 352-6
Brammer KW et al., Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in pediatric patients., Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 1994, Apr;13(4), 325-9
Hacimustafaoglu M et al. , Candida infections in non-neutropenic children after the neonatal period., Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. , 2011, Oct;9(10), 923-40
Healy CM et al, Fluconazole prophylaxis in the neonatal intensive care unit. , Pediatr Infect Dis J , 2009, 28, 49-52
Hope WW et al. , ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: prevention and management of invasive infections in neonates and children caused by Candida spp., Clin Microbiol Infect , 2012, 18 (suppl 7), 38-52
Kaufman DA, Fluconazole prophylaxis: can we eliminate invasive Candida infections in the neonatal ICU?, Curr Opin Pediatr , 2008, 20, 332-40
Kaufman DA, Why prevent invasive Candida infections?, J. Perinatol , 2008, 28, 385-8
Kaufman DA, Prevention of invasive Candida infections in preterm infants: the time is now., Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther , 2008, 6, 393-9
Kaufman DA, "Getting to Zero": preventing invasive Candida infections and eliminating infection-related mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm infants. , Early Hum Dev., 2012, May;88 Suppl 2, S45-9
Leibovitz E. , Strategies for the prevention of neonatal candidiasis., Pediatr Neonatol. , 2012, Apr;53(2), 83-9
Piper L et al. , Fluconazole loading dose pharmacokinetics and safety in infants., Pediatr Infect Dis J., 2011, May;30(5), 375-8
Saxén H, et al., Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in very low birth weight infants during the first two weeks of life., Clin Pharmacol Ther. , 1993, Sep;54(3), 269-77
Turner K et al, Fluconazole pharmacokinetics and safety in premature infants. , Curr Med Chem., 2012, 19 (27), 4617-20
Wade KC et al. , Fluconazole dosing for the prevention or treatment of invasive candidiasis in young infants. , Pediatr Infect Dis J , 2009, 28, 717-23
Watt KM et al. , . Pharmacokinetics and safety of fluconazole in young infants supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation., Pediatr Infect Dis J., 2012, Oct;31(10), 1042-7
Watt KM et al., Fluconazole Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing for Prevention and Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis in Children Supported with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. , Antimicrob Agents Chemother. , 2015, Jul;59(7), 3935-43
Weitkamp JH et al. , Fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of invasive fungal infections in targeted highest risk preterm infants limits drug exposure. , J. Perinatol , 2008, 28, 405-11
Mekkes JR, Tinea capitis (schimmel van het behaarde hoofd, hoofdschimmel). 26-5-2012, www.huidziekten.nl
Engbers AGJ, et al., Optimisation of fluconazole therapy for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in preterm infants, Arch Dis Child, 2022, Apr;107(4), 400-6
Leonart LP, et al., Fluconazole Doses Used for Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infection in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Network Meta-Analysis., J Pediatr., 2017, Jun;185, 129-35
Gerhart, J.G. et al., Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Fluconazole Using Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Samples From Preterm and Term Infants., CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol , 2019, 8(7), 500-10
Leroux, S. et al., Pharmacokinetics and safety of fluconazole and micafungin in neonates with systemic candidiasis: a randomized, open-label clinical trial., Br J Clin Pharmacol , 2018, 84(9), 1989-99
Pappas, P.G. et al., Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America., Clin Infect Dis , 2016, 62(4), e1-50
Wade, K.C. et al., Population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in young infants, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2008, 52(11), 4043-9
Momper, J.D. et al., Population Pharmacokinetics of Fluconazole in Premature Infants with Birth Weights Less than 750 Grams., Antimicrob Agents Chemother , 2016, 60(9), 5539-45
Watt, K.M. et al., Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Approach to Determine Dosing on Extracorporeal Life Support: Fluconazole in Children on ECMO., CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol , 2018, 7(10), 629-37
Robati Anaraki M, et al., Fluconazole prophylaxis against invasive candidiasis in very low and extremely low birth weight preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis., Clin Exp Pediatr., 2021, Apr;64(4), 172-9.